There's an old adage which says “taking
the path of least resistance is what causes all rivers and some men
to become crooked.” There is perhaps no better way
to destroy your life than developing the habit of taking the path of
least resistance. It's true that flowing water will always take such
a path, it has no choice. But we do have a choice. And it is our
choices which largely determine the results in our life.
This blog is no longer active:
Ken Parsell is the author of The Catalyst of Confidence and Discipline. He maintained this blog from 2011 to 2014. He is now working on other projects. Visit his website at www.kennethparsell.com.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Thursday, May 24, 2012
What Might Have Been?
We as human beings have a tendency to
look back on our past experiences and lament the fact that we could
have done something differently. “If only I had done X, how my life
would be different!” This form of reflection is beneficial as long
as we use it to learn from past mistakes in order to make better choices
in the future. But to the degree such hindsight is used to brood and
wallow over, with a kind of “what might have been?” self-pity, it
is destructive. Such behavior inhibits a person's ability to change and
plants seeds of despair in their mind. Failure is not always fatal,
but failing to change might be.
Monday, May 21, 2012
Now Available in Europe!
I am pleased to announce that The Catalyst of Confidence is now available in Europe! Amazon is now offering the book through their European sales channels in England, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy. Books purchased in Europe are still published in English. No translated editions are currently available.
Thursday, May 17, 2012
Why Do You Think What You Think?
If and when you make assertions, be prepared to defend them. If you can't explain why
you think what you think, then why do you think it in the first
place?
Friday, May 11, 2012
The Power of Ideas and Human Action
Anything that has been brought into
existence by human ingenuity can be traced back in time to two
things: 1) an idea, and 2) a person or persons. The immaterial
reality of ideas precedes the material reality of created things. A
house exists in the mind of an architect before it exists as a
physical structure. A business can be traced to the ideas and
inspirations of its founders. It is the ideas which we harbor in our
minds and subsequently act upon that shape our futures. What ideas
are you harboring?
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
A Quick Follow Up
You may have noticed that the previous post was written in rather harsh and insulting prose. Hopefully you
didn't take it as an invitation to rush off to the nearest known
“serial-venter” and tell them exactly what you just read. To be
sure, you should rarely, if ever, be as direct with someone in a
one-on-one situation (depending on factors such as your level of
influence with them, their willingness to listen, their
personality-type, etc.). You can sometimes, however, get away with it
while teaching or lecturing, during a speech, or on a blog, for
example, as the audience is much less likely to take it personally
(although you will almost always offend some people). This is usually
because they think the speaker is talking to someone other than
them. When reading the previous post, for instance, you may have
found yourself thinking something like “so-and-so needs to hear
this!” On the other hand, you may have been seriously offended, or
even angered, by what was said.
Though the topics associated with the previous post are “Likability,” “People Skills,” and “Tactfulness,”
the post itself, mainly due to its harsh tone, does not embody these
qualities. This, I suppose, is a bit of a paradox, and perhaps even
ironic. But it should be emphasized that the post was not meant to be
likable or tactful in itself, but rather, was meant to
illustrate the point (admittedly in blunt fashion) that using one's
problems as conversation pieces, ice breakers, or dead air removers,
particularly with people you are not close friends with, is indeed a
very unlikable thing. It is a quality that pushes people away
and deducts value from them.
Monday, May 7, 2012
Some Derogatory Remarks on "Venting"
People don't need to know about your
problems. Keep such things to yourself. Stop lurking around for a
fresh victim to lambast with your sorrows. If you need to talk, do so
with a close friend, but don't develop the habit of venting to
whoever will listen. People may tolerate your lamentations politely,
but will disappear when the opportunity presents itself, thankful to slip
away. Serial-venters are like the grim reaper, wandering about,
darkening the rooms they enter, killing plants and leaving corpses in
their wake. Such people are, if possible, avoided, and if not,
dreaded. No one enjoys keeping company with an emotional vampire who
sucks the life out of them. Talk to yourself, or your pet if you
must, but avoid spreading your misery among the populace. People
don't need to know about your problems. Keep such things to yourself,
or better yet, solve them.
(Companion post: A Quick Follow Up.)
Thursday, May 3, 2012
More Thoughts On The Fear of Failure
As a quick follow up to the previous post, I would like to make some further comments on the question:
Are you afraid to fail?
Fear, as we know from Lesson VI,
is a state of mind which ultimately results in inaction. The
fear of failure is no exception. When we are afraid to fail, we will
often respond by avoiding activities that may result in
failure. It seems to me, however, that the implications of such
behavior would likely, in the end, be far worse than failing (or the
risk of failing) would have been.
When we are afraid to fail, we will
(unless we choose to act despite being afraid) only involve ourselves
in activities which we believe to be nonthreatening, that is,
activities in which we expect to succeed. But such activities will
mostly consist of things we have already done and already succeeded in doing.
Thus, if we indulge and encourage our fear of failure, we are
essentially jeopardizing our ability to do things which we have
not yet done. Why? Because such
things would surely involve the possibility
of failure. The implications of this should be obvious: a person will
avoid nearly all risk taking, thereby undermining their ability to
accomplish their goals and dreams (assuming they have goals and dreams).
Ask: How did I ever do anything for the very first time? Did I
risk the possibility of failure? You did. And you can do it again.
Besides, even if you fail, at least you have something to work with
and build upon: you can identify causes of failure, try again, and
persist your way to success. On the other hand, the person who, out
of fear of failure, fails to act, has nothing to work with, nor can
they accomplish anything. The life which has already done everything
it is going to do has already been lived. Is it really worth being afraid?
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Understanding Your Tendencies: Lesson VII
At the end of each lesson in The
Catalyst of Confidence there is a short section entitled
“understanding your tendencies.” These sections are composed of a
series of questions designed to help the reader understand and apply
some of the information that was conveyed during the lesson. What
follows is my commentary on these questions from Lesson VII: Failure
and Adversity.
1. Are you afraid to fail?
As described in the lesson, most of us
are afraid to fail. This is often because we have learned to
view failure as an indictment on who we are: When we fail, we see it
as definitive proof that we're no good at something, or perhaps no
good in general. But when we realize that failure is a natural
learning process; that it is something we must tolerate as we advance
from #1 to #4 in The Four Stages of Learning (which
applies to everything we actively do), we should realize that
evaluating ourselves on the basis of failure is absurd. Also, see
Question #6 below.
2. Have you ever believed that
some people were always good at what they do?
When we see a person who is
exceptionally good at something, it's easy to assume that they've
always been good at it. Such people are often described as being
“gifted” or “talented.” And, unfortunately, that's how most
people view them. But while it may be true that a person can possess
a certain amount of natural ability or talent, it is wrong to assume
that they are as good as they are solely because of talent. To
be sure, raw talent can only take a person so far, beyond which,
other factors come into play. The very best of the best, in whichever
field, are as good as they are, not necessarily because of talent,
but because they wanted to be the best, and were willing to
learn how to do it. The person who has a burning desire and the
willingness to learn will, almost always, outperform the person who
possess great natural talent, but has a weak desire/willingness to
learn. Stephen King's quote from Lesson X seems appropriate:
“Talent is cheaper than table salt. What separates the talented
individual from the successful one is a lot of hard work and study.”
It's also worth remembering that, at one time, the best of the best
were in a position where they had never done what they are now
known for doing. Further reading: See Process and Product in
Lesson VII.
3. How do you respond when you
fail?
When things don't go as you expect
(assuming, of course, you aren't expecting to fail), how do you
react? Do you analyze, adjust, and try again? Or do you throw a fit
and whine like a young child? There are really only two responses to
failure: persist or give up.
4. Do you let other people's
opinions determine what you attempt to do?
It's easy to measure your life against
standards imposed on you by other people. Consider a child who has no
desire to play (say) baseball, but who plays nonetheless, because his
father wants him to. When we're young, we don't have much say in such
situations. But when we grow up we do. Yet many adults continue to
make important decisions, not on the basis of their own values, but
on the basis of the values of others. Consider the attorney who went
to law school because that's what her parents wanted, rather
than what she wanted. In addition, “other people” have a
tendency to always point out what “can't be done.” It is, in many
ways, a tragedy that so many dreams are snuffed out by the arrogant
and often baseless criticisms made by one's contemporaries.
5. Can you think of something
good that came about as a result of something you initially thought
was bad?
This question fits closely with
Napoleon Hill's famous saying: “Every adversity, every failure and
every heartache carries with it the Seed of an equivalent or greater
Benefit.” The key to doing this is looking for the seed of
an equivalent or greater benefit. No experience is worthless, unless
you let it pass without learning something from it.
6. Do you associate your
self-worth with your failures or mistakes?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)