This blog is no longer active:

Ken Parsell is the author of The Catalyst of Confidence and Discipline. He maintained this blog from 2011 to 2014. He is now working on other projects. Visit his website at www.kennethparsell.com.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

The Path of Least Resistance

There's an old adage which says “taking the path of least resistance is what causes all rivers and some men to become crooked.” There is perhaps no better way to destroy your life than developing the habit of taking the path of least resistance. It's true that flowing water will always take such a path, it has no choice. But we do have a choice. And it is our choices which largely determine the results in our life.

Thursday, May 24, 2012

What Might Have Been?

We as human beings have a tendency to look back on our past experiences and lament the fact that we could have done something differently. “If only I had done X, how my life would be different!” This form of reflection is beneficial as long as we use it to learn from past mistakes in order to make better choices in the future. But to the degree such hindsight is used to brood and wallow over, with a kind of “what might have been?” self-pity, it is destructive. Such behavior inhibits a person's ability to change and plants seeds of despair in their mind. Failure is not always fatal, but failing to change might be.

Monday, May 21, 2012

Now Available in Europe!

I am pleased to announce that The Catalyst of Confidence is now available in Europe! Amazon is now offering the book through their European sales channels in England, FranceGermanySpain, and Italy. Books purchased in Europe are still published in English. No translated editions are currently available.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Why Do You Think What You Think?

If and when you make assertions, be prepared to defend them. If you can't explain why you think what you think, then why do you think it in the first place?

Friday, May 11, 2012

The Power of Ideas and Human Action

Anything that has been brought into existence by human ingenuity can be traced back in time to two things: 1) an idea, and 2) a person or persons. The immaterial reality of ideas precedes the material reality of created things. A house exists in the mind of an architect before it exists as a physical structure. A business can be traced to the ideas and inspirations of its founders. It is the ideas which we harbor in our minds and subsequently act upon that shape our futures. What ideas are you harboring?

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

A Quick Follow Up

You may have noticed that the previous post was written in rather harsh and insulting prose. Hopefully you didn't take it as an invitation to rush off to the nearest known “serial-venter” and tell them exactly what you just read. To be sure, you should rarely, if ever, be as direct with someone in a one-on-one situation (depending on factors such as your level of influence with them, their willingness to listen, their personality-type, etc.). You can sometimes, however, get away with it while teaching or lecturing, during a speech, or on a blog, for example, as the audience is much less likely to take it personally (although you will almost always offend some people). This is usually because they think the speaker is talking to someone other than them. When reading the previous post, for instance, you may have found yourself thinking something like “so-and-so needs to hear this!” On the other hand, you may have been seriously offended, or even angered, by what was said.

Though the topics associated with the previous post are “Likability,” “People Skills,” and “Tactfulness,” the post itself, mainly due to its harsh tone, does not embody these qualities. This, I suppose, is a bit of a paradox, and perhaps even ironic. But it should be emphasized that the post was not meant to be likable or tactful in itself, but rather, was meant to illustrate the point (admittedly in blunt fashion) that using one's problems as conversation pieces, ice breakers, or dead air removers, particularly with people you are not close friends with, is indeed a very unlikable thing. It is a quality that pushes people away and deducts value from them.

Monday, May 7, 2012

Some Derogatory Remarks on "Venting"

People don't need to know about your problems. Keep such things to yourself. Stop lurking around for a fresh victim to lambast with your sorrows. If you need to talk, do so with a close friend, but don't develop the habit of venting to whoever will listen. People may tolerate your lamentations politely, but will disappear when the opportunity presents itself, thankful to slip away. Serial-venters are like the grim reaper, wandering about, darkening the rooms they enter, killing plants and leaving corpses in their wake. Such people are, if possible, avoided, and if not, dreaded. No one enjoys keeping company with an emotional vampire who sucks the life out of them. Talk to yourself, or your pet if you must, but avoid spreading your misery among the populace. People don't need to know about your problems. Keep such things to yourself, or better yet, solve them.

(Companion post: A Quick Follow Up.)

Thursday, May 3, 2012

More Thoughts On The Fear of Failure

As a quick follow up to the previous post, I would like to make some further comments on the question: Are you afraid to fail?

Fear, as we know from Lesson VI, is a state of mind which ultimately results in inaction. The fear of failure is no exception. When we are afraid to fail, we will often respond by avoiding activities that may result in failure. It seems to me, however, that the implications of such behavior would likely, in the end, be far worse than failing (or the risk of failing) would have been.

When we are afraid to fail, we will (unless we choose to act despite being afraid) only involve ourselves in activities which we believe to be nonthreatening, that is, activities in which we expect to succeed. But such activities will mostly consist of things we have already done and already succeeded in doing. Thus, if we indulge and encourage our fear of failure, we are essentially jeopardizing our ability to do things which we have not yet done. Why? Because such things would surely involve the possibility of failure. The implications of this should be obvious: a person will avoid nearly all risk taking, thereby undermining their ability to accomplish their goals and dreams (assuming they have goals and dreams).

Ask: How did I ever do anything for the very first time? Did I risk the possibility of failure? You did. And you can do it again. Besides, even if you fail, at least you have something to work with and build upon: you can identify causes of failure, try again, and persist your way to success. On the other hand, the person who, out of fear of failure, fails to act, has nothing to work with, nor can they accomplish anything. The life which has already done everything it is going to do has already been lived. Is it really worth being afraid?

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Understanding Your Tendencies: Lesson VII

At the end of each lesson in The Catalyst of Confidence there is a short section entitled “understanding your tendencies.” These sections are composed of a series of questions designed to help the reader understand and apply some of the information that was conveyed during the lesson. What follows is my commentary on these questions from Lesson VII: Failure and Adversity.

1. Are you afraid to fail?

As described in the lesson, most of us are afraid to fail. This is often because we have learned to view failure as an indictment on who we are: When we fail, we see it as definitive proof that we're no good at something, or perhaps no good in general. But when we realize that failure is a natural learning process; that it is something we must tolerate as we advance from #1 to #4 in The Four Stages of Learning (which applies to everything we actively do), we should realize that evaluating ourselves on the basis of failure is absurd. Also, see Question #6 below.

2. Have you ever believed that some people were always good at what they do?

When we see a person who is exceptionally good at something, it's easy to assume that they've always been good at it. Such people are often described as being “gifted” or “talented.” And, unfortunately, that's how most people view them. But while it may be true that a person can possess a certain amount of natural ability or talent, it is wrong to assume that they are as good as they are solely because of talent. To be sure, raw talent can only take a person so far, beyond which, other factors come into play. The very best of the best, in whichever field, are as good as they are, not necessarily because of talent, but because they wanted to be the best, and were willing to learn how to do it. The person who has a burning desire and the willingness to learn will, almost always, outperform the person who possess great natural talent, but has a weak desire/willingness to learn. Stephen King's quote from Lesson X seems appropriate: “Talent is cheaper than table salt. What separates the talented individual from the successful one is a lot of hard work and study.” It's also worth remembering that, at one time, the best of the best were in a position where they had never done what they are now known for doing. Further reading: See Process and Product in Lesson VII.

3. How do you respond when you fail?

When things don't go as you expect (assuming, of course, you aren't expecting to fail), how do you react? Do you analyze, adjust, and try again? Or do you throw a fit and whine like a young child? There are really only two responses to failure: persist or give up.

4. Do you let other people's opinions determine what you attempt to do?

It's easy to measure your life against standards imposed on you by other people. Consider a child who has no desire to play (say) baseball, but who plays nonetheless, because his father wants him to. When we're young, we don't have much say in such situations. But when we grow up we do. Yet many adults continue to make important decisions, not on the basis of their own values, but on the basis of the values of others. Consider the attorney who went to law school because that's what her parents wanted, rather than what she wanted. In addition, “other people” have a tendency to always point out what “can't be done.” It is, in many ways, a tragedy that so many dreams are snuffed out by the arrogant and often baseless criticisms made by one's contemporaries.

5. Can you think of something good that came about as a result of something you initially thought was bad?

This question fits closely with Napoleon Hill's famous saying: “Every adversity, every failure and every heartache carries with it the Seed of an equivalent or greater Benefit.” The key to doing this is looking for the seed of an equivalent or greater benefit. No experience is worthless, unless you let it pass without learning something from it.

6. Do you associate your self-worth with your failures or mistakes?