I was recently reminded of a past
student of mine who would regularly object to various things I
taught. The grounds of his objections were as follows: Everything you
teach is very simple and easy to understand and doesn't contradict
the general experiences of a person. In fact you normally cite life
experiences that most people can relate to as evidence of that which
you teach. But because of this, the things you teach are basically
things that people already know. Therefore, because the things you
teach are already known to a person, they cannot possibly be valuable to them.
This reasoning is actually quite
hilarious, because it seems to imply that the only person who could
potentially learn anything from what I write is the person who is
isn't intelligent enough to have learned these things on their own.
Thus, if you have learned anything at all from this blog, my student
would no doubt label you as one example of such a person.
Still, I believe the student's argument
to be naïve at best. My appeal to a person's “general life
experience” is, in many ways, a concrete method of relating
to them. It definitely helps the reader/student to better grasp
whatever it is that I'm talking about. But it does not follow that,
because I have appealed to the life experience of a person, and then
proceeded to make a connection or observation on the basis of that
experience, that the person will have already made that same
connection or observation prior to my relating it to them.
As an example, consider the concept of
fear. Nearly everyone can perform some action which they were once
(but no longer) afraid to do. To borrow from the previous post,
during “driver's ed” many people are afraid to drive a car on the
road amongst other automobiles, especially if they have no experience
driving things. Yet after years of having their drivers license and
operating a vehicle, they display no fear whatsoever when driving.
Such is an example that many people relate to. But many have not made
the connection that in order to overcome a fear, they must do that
which they are afraid to do, and when they do that, they expand their
comfort zone, and their fear begins to subside. Such an observation
is, for many people, a kind of revelation or epiphany which enables
them to better face and overcome fears throughout their life, and if
that is in fact the case, surely they wouldn't accuse me of “teaching
them something they already knew.”
On the other hand, perhaps the said
student—albeit at the midpoint of his teenage years—had already
figured out everything worth knowing.
No comments:
Post a Comment